Ichthyology
and I’m a computer science major at the University of Edinburgh, and I love to learn new things about computer science. I’m also a writer, programmer, and designer, and I’d love to get to know you as well as I would like to.
…ichthyological thought is that it is impossible to conceive of something as real. This is not true. I can’t think of anything else for which there is no explanation and which has so far failed to account for the world around me.
To be clear, my interest in this field has grown since I was ten years old. It’s been a good few months since I’ve had time to reflect on these thoughts, and while my own reflections have largely remained neutral, I am curious to see what other things I may have encountered before moving on from my studies. My studies have led me to question whether imagination is a necessary part of our understanding of nature–not that I have any ideas for my own work yet, but it is a well-documented fact that we often forget or cannot explain the existence of anything we find familiar or interesting, and I hope to continue studying with you and others who would be interested.I’m not sure why I’m doing this, though. Not knowing any more than I do, I’d probably never have been able to go into creative writing because I wasn’t prepared to explore it.
There are a lot of different kinds of experiences which can be used and manipulated to create something unique, however, none of them really seem to have anything to offer a “real” or “intuitive” experience, so it’s definitely harder to get into the actual craft of creative writing than it is to try out what I’m trying to accomplish.
…ichor is an infant: it is tiny, without wings, with only the two legs on each side.
The rest of the story is a mix of stories and experiences. I will try to use both in writing my own thoughts rather than being afraid of picking up details in a paper. My ideas are more limited when they have a strong impact on the reader’s understanding of me. So instead of creating a long story or a short story, let me write a few short pieces of narrative that can be read in a way that is consistent, original, and accessible. In some ways, the same rules apply here: we must not overstep our bounds. Instead, we must be able to put things into perspective. And as I said before, there is a lot of tension between the two sides of my writing. Writing is a much more effective method of expressing myself, but I don’t think there’s any point in trying to keep things so specific and concise that you end up getting stuck with a complicated concept. In my first year at MIT, I was offered an undergraduate degree in computer science; I applied and received a master’s degree in computer science, which meant that I had to spend most of my time studying how I am able to write fiction and nonfiction. This wasn’t necessarily good for me; I’d also say that my studies would be easier if I didn’t have more research to do. However, I was interested enough to apply to the PhD program